UCAP Meeting of 09/25/2008 2008-2009 agenda status: not approved Agenda: University Committee on Academic Policy AGENDA Thursday, September 25, 2008 10:15 A.M. to 12:00 P.M. Board Room, 4th Floor, Administration Building
Phone or e-mail Sandra Walther (353-5380; swalther@msu.edu) if you cannot be present. Please remember that you are asked to send a substitute from your college. minutes status: approved approved at meeting of 10/23/2008 UCAP Minutes for meeting held on 09/25/2008 University Committee on Academic Policy Thursday, September 25, 2008 10:15 A.M. to 12:00 P.M. Board Room, Administration Building Minutes Attendees: Mary Jo Arndt, Dennis Banks, R. Sekhar Chivukula, Peter Cobbett, Marty Crimp, Doug Estry, Mandalyn Griffin, Richard Hallgren, Caroline Hartig, Linda Jackson, Chris Kline, Hovig Kouyoumdjian, Michael Lawrence, Carolyn Loeb, Brad McDonald, Matt McKeon, Jerry Punch, Michael Schechter, Sharif Shakrani, Mike Shields, Jim Smith, Tom Volkening Absent: A Mahdi Saeed, Parita Shah The Agenda was approved The Minutes of the September 18, 2008 meeting were approved. Comments from the Chair Dr. Chivukula welcomed COGS representative, Hovig Kouyoumdjian. Chairperson Chivukula reported that at the most recent meeting of the Academic Council:
Comments from the Associate Provost for Undergraduate Education Associate Provost Estry indicated his report, regarding shortened fall welcome would be provided to the Provost within the week. The Provost will distribute the report for comment. Dr. Estry reported the Sustainability Specialization proposal gained the support of several colleges. The proposal could be sent to UCC this semester. Request to Change the Admission Requirements for the Bachelor of Arts Degree in Hospitality Business Ronald Cichy, Director, The School of Hospitality Business Jeff Elsworth, Chairperson, Undergraduate Programs Committee Sherri Henry, Coordinator of Academic Student Services The committee unanimously granted voice to the representatives of The School of Hospitality Business. Dr. Cichy, Dr. Elsworth, and Ms. Henry briefly outlined the current requirements and rationale for the requested changes, indicating removal of the 2.0 GPA requirement would lessen the misconception that a 2.0 GPA would be adequate for admission when in practice the GPA’s of students admitted averaged significantly higher than 2.0. The average GPA’s of admitted students would be posted on the School’s website rather than placing that information in the catalogue. Committee discussion centered on the need to post minimum GPA’s on the School’s website rather than average GPA’s, since the intent is to let prospective applicants see the lowest GPA’s of those already accepted. Motion by Mary Jo Arndt passed unanimously.
Request to Add a Grade-Point Average Requirement in the Bachelor of Arts Degree in Journalism Janet Lillie, Associate Dean, College of Communication Arts & Sciences Jane Briggs-Bunting, Director, School of Journalism, College of Communication Arts & Sciences The committee unanimously granted voice to the representatives the College of Communication Arts & Sciences. Drs. Lillie and Briggs-Bunting provided the Journalism Department’s rationale for its request to implement a 2.5 GPA requirement in two Journalism courses, with a minimum grade of 2.0 in each course, for admission to the major, indicating this change would signify to prospective applicants that more than minimum academic effort is required to be accepted. As a skill-based discipline, the increased academic requirement would enhance the potential for students’ successful degree completion. By adding this requirement, the Journalism admissions process would then be quantitative, the stipulation of a particular entry-level GPA, and qualitative, submission of a portfolio of the student’s work. The former provides evidence of academic ability and the latter allows recognition for professional-level work. Committee discussion centered on
Roundtable Dr. Estry suggested that, given the standard to repeat a course is 2.0 and the GPA requirement for graduation is 2.0, and the increasing number of requests to require GPA’s higher than 2.0 for admission to majors and progression in majors, the committee might want to consider these topics and propose changes or reaffirm the current policies. The committee discussion centered on the following issues:
Chairperson Chivukula remarked that this appeared to be an issue of interest to the committee. He asked committee members to email him with questions they think should be investigated. Meeting adjourned at 11:30 am. Respectfully submitted by Sandra Walther |
Agenda/Minutes > 2008-2009 >