Agenda/Minutes‎ > ‎2010-2011‎ > ‎

2010 - 09/16

UCAP Meeting of 09/16/2010

2010-2011



agenda status: approved

Agenda:

University Committee on Academic Policy
AGENDA
Thursday, September 16, 2010
10:15 A.M. to 12:00 P.M.
Board Room, 4th Floor, Administration Building

  1. Motion to Establish Taking of the Minutes (Action Item)
  2. Approval of the Agenda
  3. Welcome and Introductions
    Gillian Bice, Chairperson, UCAP
    Doug Estry, Associate Provost Undergraduate Education
  4. Comments from the Chairperson
        1. UCAP Bylaws and Role in Academic Governance
        2. Elected Committee Positions and Subcommittees
        3. Committee Operating Procedures
          1. Robert’s Rules
          2. Responsibilities of committee members
          3. Additional meetings
        4. Committee Operating Procedures
          1. Voting (conducting business) via email or surveymonkey.com
          2. Procedure for granting and removing voice for visitors
          3. Public comment procedure
        5. UCAP Business Review and Preview
  5. Comments from the Associate Provost for Undergraduate Education
        1. Variables that Guide UCAP’s Consideration of Academic Program Moratoria and Discontinuances (Information item)
        2. Role of UCAP in reviewing New Programs
        3. Lifting of the Moratorium on the BS in Veterinary Technology
        4. University Updates and Future UCAP items of business
  6. Approval of the April 29, 2010 Minutes
  7. Request for a New Linked BA Degree in Economics and Master of Public Policy Degree in Public Policy.........(Attachment)
    Tom Summerhill, Associate Dean, College of Social Science
    Paul Menchik, Professor, Department of Economics
  8. Request for a New Linked BA or BS Degree in Political Science (General) and Master of Public Policy Degree in Public Policy.........(Attachment)
    Tom Summerhill, Associate Dean, College of Social Science
    Saundra Schneider, Professor, Department of Political Science
  9. Request to Phase Out and Discontinue the Bachelor of Science Degree in Agriscience.........(Attachment)
    Rick Brandenburg, Acting Associate Dean, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources
    Eunice Foster, Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Science
    Matt Raven, Professor, Department of Community, Agriculture, Recreation, and Resource Studies
  10. Roundtable



minutes status: approved

approved at meeting of 09/23/2010

UCAP Minutes for meeting held on 09/16/2010

University Committee on Academic Policy
MINUTES
Thursday, September 16, 2010
10:15 A.M. to 12:00 P.M.
Board Room, 4th Floor, Administration Building


Attendees: Paul Abramson, Gillian Bice, Crystal Branta, Lisa Cook, Doug Estry, Abdol Esfahanian, Anita Ezzo, Fred Fico, Kathleen Hoag, Matthew McKeon, Tom Morse, Mary Noel, Justin O’Dell, Helene Pazak, Ron Perry, John Reifenberg, Christopher Scales, Jim Smith, Mary Kay Smith

Absent: Laura Dillon, Chris Noffze, Mike Shields, Chenguang Wang

The following motion passed unanimously:
      The secretary for the Associate Provost for Undergraduate Education shall attend Committee meetings and prepare minutes for review and approval by committee membership.
The Agenda was approved, noting that the committee’s review of the two new linked Undergraduate/Masters program requests would be reviewed by the committee at the same time.

Comments from the Chairperson
Chairperson Bice welcomed new and returning members to the committee. Members introduced themselves. Dr. Bice reviewed UCAP’s bylaws and the committee’s role within the academic governance structure.

Dr. Bice reviewed the elected committee positions and introduced the incumbents. She reported that the SIRS subcommittee from the year prior was still an active subcommittee. As two of the members of the subcommittee were no longer representatives to the committee, she asked volunteers to replace them. Ron Perry and Tom Morse volunteered to serve on the SIRS subcommittee. She further encouraged formation of subcommittees when appropriate topics arise in order to move business along more effectively.

Dr. Bice suggested the committee adhere to Robert’s Rules of Order as appropriate for a committee the size of UCAP. She recommended the following website as an excellence resource: http://www.parlipro.org/index.html.

Chairperson Bice reviewed the responsibilities of committee members. It is important for each member to find a substitute from their college if they are unable to attend a meeting. Although substitutes would not have vote, they would be able to express the views of their constituents regarding issues of concern to their college. Dr. Bice stated that a key role of UCAP committee members would be to share committee business that might be of interest to their college with the appropriate stakeholders. As the committee considers moratoriums and discontinuances, members must be sure to communicate information within the college to ensure their constituents would be aware of items of concern on upcoming agendas.

Chairperson Bice asked members to have read materials and prepared questions prior to the committee meetings. She noted that most of the committee’s meeting materials would be available on the UCAP website, http://ucap.msu.edu.

Dr. Bice stated that it might become necessary to hold additional meetings in order to allow due consideration of all slated agenda items. She asked the committee members to reserve every Thursday not scheduled for regular committee meetings for possible additional meetings or subcommittee meetings. She asked the committee for the authority and autonomy to call additional meetings. Hearing no objections, the practice will be adopted as procedure for 2010-11 academic year.

Chairperson Bice noted that a meeting might end with the need for formalizing language for a motion or a document before it could be sent forward or posted on the web. She asked the committee to approve conducting such business electronically. Motion by Fred Fico passed unanimously.

      The committee agrees to allow the flexibility to take votes by email on issues already discussed with the provision that, if any one member objects, the issue will return to the agenda at the next meeting.

In the past, UCAP had adopted a streamlined procedure for the chairperson to grant and remove voice for visitors. Chairperson Bice requested that the committee allow the chair to grant and take away voice without a formal committee vote, hearing no objections; permission was granted.

Motion by Ron Perry to continue to use the Public Comment Procedures as adopted by the committee on November 19, 2009 passed unanimously.


UCAP Business Review and Preview
Chairperson Bice recalled that the Course Repeat Policy proposed by UCAP should come before academic governance committees for comment this year.

Professor Jim Smith provided his report on the recent ECAC meeting. President Simon discussed the Neighborhoods concept of consolidating services in the dorms. She also remarked that it would be important to figure out how the next governor would prioritize education. David Gift presented a new University data policy, which does not apply to research or academic work that will be sent to UCAP for review and comment. There was also discussion of University Anti-Discrimination Policy, which will be reviewed by academic governance committees this year. A motion by a faculty member to require that student instructional ratings be statistically valid was rescinded. Dr. Smith provided ECAC with an informal account of the SIRS pilot conducted over the summer. ECAC members expressed interest in hearing the results of the pilot. Additionally, a proposed reorganization of several medical science departments will be sent to UCAP for comment.

Professor Abramson requested further explanation of the Neighborhood program. Associate Provost Estry responded the Neighborhoods would better connect students with resources available on campus by making the resources available in the students “neighborhood” dormitory complex. A pilot Neighborhoods program has been established in Hubbard Hall for fall 2010. The MSU Neighborhood concept is modeled after the residential colleges that are known for successfully connecting students with support and resources.


Comments from the Associate Provost for Undergraduate Education
Associate Provost Estry reviewed committee responsibilities (scope and purview) for moratoriums and discontinuances. He noted that consideration of new programs, although always in the purview of UCAP, began being sent to UCAP for consideration in 2009-10.

Dr. Estry announced that the moratorium on the Veterinary Technology program had been lifted by the Provost. He noted that changes recommended to the integrative studies policies should be forwarded by the Provost for consultation by the committee in the next few weeks. He noted the Course Repeat Policy would be forwarded to ECAC when an associated implementation plan to be proposed by the Office of the Registrar was completed.


The minutes of the April 29, 2010 were approved.


Request for a New Linked BA Degree in Economics and Master of Public Policy in Public Policy
Request for a New Linked BA or BS Degree in Political Science (General) and Master of Public Policy Degree in Public Policy
Tom Summerhill, Associate Dean, College of Social Science
Paul Menchik, Professor, Department of Economics
Saundra Schneider, Professor, Department of Political Science

The committee unanimously granted voice to Associate Dean Summerhill and Professors Menchik and Schneider.

Associate Dean Summerhill prefaced the presentation of the rationale stating that Economics and Political Science were two of the College of Social Science’s most internationally prestigious programs. The Design of the linked programs was very selective and fit with the University’s goal of allowing students to the degree strong preparation in the field but fewer credits.

Dr. Schneider, the current director of the Masters in Public Policy program indicated that the department decided to pursue the linked undergraduate/masters program when University first created procedure and the department was developing MA in Public Policy program. It was clear to them that they were in danger of losing the top undergraduate students to other universities because students could move more quickly through those programs to a master’s degree. The overall goal of the linked programs would be to train students to pursue careers in policy analysis, advocacy, and leadership. The 3.5 GPA admission requirement mirrors that of other linked programs at MSU. The GRE would not be required for students going into the linked programs and a high GPA would be a good indicator that students could pursue master’s level work.

Dr. Menchik indicated that allowing the 400 level courses in Economics and Public Policy provides a breadth of courses that the small masters program had been unable to provide, making the MSU master in Public Policy more competitive with large programs at other universities.

Questions from the committee centered on the availability of an appeals process for students who had not achieved a 3.5 at the time of requesting admission to the linked program and the type of program guidance available to students.

Professor Schneider responded that an admissions appeals process was already in place for students who are almost at established levels of admittance as well as for the regular MPP program. If students don’t have the appropriate GPA or high enough GRE scores, they can ask the admissions committee to review prior coursework or other information that would mitigate the GPA or GRE difference. This admissions committee would review applications to the linked program as well. Students would work with advisors to plan their linked BS/MA program.

The committee withdrew voice for Associate Dean Summerhill and Professors Schneider and Menchik.

Motion by Ron Perry passed unanimously.
      The University Committee on Academic Policy, in its consultative capacity to the Provost, has no concerns about the request for a new linked Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics and Master of Public Policy degree in Public Policy and no concerns about the request for a new linked Bachelor of Arts or Bachelor of Science degree in Political Science (general) and Master of Public Policy Degree in Public Policy.

Request to Phase Out and Discontinue the Bachelor of Science Degree in Agriscience.
Eunice Foster, Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences
Matt Raven, Professor, Department of Community, Agriculture, Recreation, and Resource Studies

The committee unanimously granted voice to Professors Foster and Raven.

Professor Raven stated that the Agriscience undergraduate degree was one of the majors folded into a new major with 4 concentrations when several departments were merged into the CARRS. The Agriscience degree has been replaced by a concentration. The Agriscience degree remained as a legacy while new the degree program underwent the State of Michigan Department of Education certification process. The new major and its concentrations were recognized and certified in 2009. Currently, there are nine legacy majors. Five are on track to graduate spring 2011 and four will graduate in spring 2012. If a current Agriscience student should fall behind the current estimated graduation date, they will have until fall of 2014 to complete the major.. New students wishing to be certified are advised into the new concentration.

The committee withdrew voice from Professors Foster and Raven.
Motion by Lisa Cook passed unanimously.
      The University Committee on Academic Policy, in its consultative capacity to the Provost, has no concerns about the request to phase out and discontinue the Bachelor of Science degree in Agriscience.


Roundtable
Kathleen Hoag reported that the University Committee on Liberal Learning had its first meeting. The committee discussed proposals for its focus for 2010-11.

Lisa Cook recommended that the UCAP website be updated to include UCAPs procedures for public comment as a tab, making it easier to find.

The meeting was adjourned.

Respectfully submitted by
Sandra Walther